Recent Comments
non-theory
theory
Archives
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
Categories
- Chinese (8)
- diversions (45)
- food (15)
- Larry Summers (6)
- lies damn lies and … (4)
- math (55)
- movies (12)
- philosophy (18)
- places (76)
- Berkeley (5)
- China (27)
- Italy (14)
- Los Angeles (2)
- New York (6)
- San Francisco (14)
- Taiwan (8)
- politics (28)
- teaching (6)
- CS278 (2)
- technology (4)
- theory (60)
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 15, 2007 at 12:45 am
Scott
It’s wonderful to see someone worth profiling profiled! (I was going to point out how they botched the statement of the Green-Tao theorem, but I see they’ve already posted a correction.)
March 15, 2007 at 1:51 am
Anonymous
“It’s wonderful to see someone worth profiling profiled!”
I’m not sure what that statement should be taken to imply about this list of other profile recipients:
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/science/columns/scientistatwork/index.html
March 15, 2007 at 5:20 pm
Scott
No, no, no — I was talking in general, not about the “Scientist at Work” series (which on the whole is admirable).