<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turing Centennial Post 2: Günter Ziegler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/turing-centennial-post-2-gunter-ziegler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/turing-centennial-post-2-gunter-ziegler/</link>
	<description>&#34;Marge, I agree with you - in theory. In theory, communism works. In theory.&#34; -- Homer Simpson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:08:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: (Belated) Turing Centennial Series from &#8216;in Theory&#8217; blog &#171; kryptomusing</title>
		<link>http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/turing-centennial-post-2-gunter-ziegler/#comment-7176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[(Belated) Turing Centennial Series from &#8216;in Theory&#8217; blog &#171; kryptomusing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/?p=2495#comment-7176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Turing Centennial Post 2: Günter Ziegler [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Turing Centennial Post 2: Günter Ziegler [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turing Centennial Series from In Theory blog &#124; Healthy Algorithms</title>
		<link>http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/turing-centennial-post-2-gunter-ziegler/#comment-6375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turing Centennial Series from In Theory blog &#124; Healthy Algorithms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/?p=2495#comment-6375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Turing Centennial Post 2: Günter Ziegler [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Turing Centennial Post 2: Günter Ziegler [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s here! The DiS Carnival #17 &#8211; PRIDE! &#124; Balanced Instability</title>
		<link>http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/turing-centennial-post-2-gunter-ziegler/#comment-5785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[It&#8217;s here! The DiS Carnival #17 &#8211; PRIDE! &#124; Balanced Instability]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 01:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/?p=2495#comment-5785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] it so that there is no reason to be in the closet for fear of negative reaction in the workplace. Günter Ziegler wrote a letter to Turing dedicating the Berlin Pride Party in his honor, which is fantastic. Irit [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it so that there is no reason to be in the closet for fear of negative reaction in the workplace. Günter Ziegler wrote a letter to Turing dedicating the Berlin Pride Party in his honor, which is fantastic. Irit [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous moose</title>
		<link>http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/turing-centennial-post-2-gunter-ziegler/#comment-5571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous moose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/?p=2495#comment-5571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To me, personally, there&#039;s something very satisfying about this apology: the awkwardness of it, the fact that its wording actually hides the subtext &quot;I guess we are apologizing right now, but it&#039;s a bit weird to apologize for primitive idiots that have done these things, and whose world view in this matter is so foreign to our own&quot;. In other words, the sheer weirdness of this apology is the thing that makes me feel good about it: apologizing for the mistreatment that Turing suffered is akin to apologizing for medieval witch-burning. There are still many ways in which LGBT people are mistreated in the world, and these need to be corrected, but the fact that the policy-makers and public opinion in most modern countries are so far from their counterpart of 60 years ago is something to be proud of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, personally, there&#8217;s something very satisfying about this apology: the awkwardness of it, the fact that its wording actually hides the subtext &#8220;I guess we are apologizing right now, but it&#8217;s a bit weird to apologize for primitive idiots that have done these things, and whose world view in this matter is so foreign to our own&#8221;. In other words, the sheer weirdness of this apology is the thing that makes me feel good about it: apologizing for the mistreatment that Turing suffered is akin to apologizing for medieval witch-burning. There are still many ways in which LGBT people are mistreated in the world, and these need to be corrected, but the fact that the policy-makers and public opinion in most modern countries are so far from their counterpart of 60 years ago is something to be proud of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Günter M. Ziegler</title>
		<link>http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/turing-centennial-post-2-gunter-ziegler/#comment-5568</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Günter M. Ziegler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/?p=2495#comment-5568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear William Gasarch,
1) yes. (But admitting that it was wrong and indeed a crime how Turing was treated would set a precedent.)
2) yes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear William Gasarch,<br />
1) yes. (But admitting that it was wrong and indeed a crime how Turing was treated would set a precedent.)<br />
2) yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Gasarch</title>
		<link>http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/2012/06/22/turing-centennial-post-2-gunter-ziegler/#comment-5547</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Gasarch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lucatrevisan.wordpress.com/?p=2495#comment-5547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suppose the apology is better than not doing it, but I have two issues with it

1) What about other gay people in England who were unjustly punished
in some way in that era. They don&#039;t get an apology since they are not famous enough.

2) Apologies like this always come way way after everyone who could possible be held accountable is dead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the apology is better than not doing it, but I have two issues with it</p>
<p>1) What about other gay people in England who were unjustly punished<br />
in some way in that era. They don&#8217;t get an apology since they are not famous enough.</p>
<p>2) Apologies like this always come way way after everyone who could possible be held accountable is dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
